I am
still in Sydney organising things I need to organise before my holiday, hence
not much time for writing or thinking about what to write about. Even the story
about my first boyfriend has been put on ice. It has been quite nice to go back
in my thoughts to the old very happy and carefree times. In the process of writing, I have learnt a
lot about myself. It is also very pleasant to recollect the times, so I intend
to continue the writing only a little later.
Today
is Saturday and I thought I will take a break from the preparation to the trip.
I went to see a movie, I rather did not plan to see, but it has been
enthusiastically mentioned by one of my bridge friends, so changed my plans and
went to see Denial.
My earlier
reservations were about the subject of the film. I have seen so many films
about Holocaust with Auschwitz as a place of action that I thought I will give
myself a break. I still remember the primary school excursion to the
concentration camp. I was so shocked by the exhibits that I will not be able to
go there again. The pictures are still vivid in my memory. I shudder when I
think that the place I stay at when in Gdansk, was during the war occupied by
professor Spanner who developed the method of producing soap. I cannot bring
myself to be specific about it.
Anyhow,
I went to see the film and I do not regret it. Obviously, I do not feel
uplifted this afternoon, but it is a good film. The story is very interesting
and it did happen in real life. It is sad that life writes such good, but
unpleasant scenarios. What is even sadder is that it is relevant to this day.
The story is about the legal battle for historical truth requiring a proof that
the Holocaust really happened. David Irving accused Deborah Lipstadt of libel
when she called him denier of historical truth. It is relevant as in many
countries neo-Nazis movements are more and more prevalent and often considered
a sign of patriotism. For such movements, the truth of Holocaust is
uncomfortable and there is temptation to deny that it did happen.
The
film’s title Denial, has double
meaning. The obvious one describes the subject of the film and the second one
relates to needed self-denial of Deborah Lipstadt and survivors of Auschwitz.
The accused, an acclaimed historian and a writer, assumes that she will be able
to defend herself taking a stand during the trial. She also expects that she
will be able to call on one of the survivors of the Holocaust. The team of
lawyers, however, has different plans and their approach does not include any active
involvement in the trial of the accused. This causes strong controversy between
the client and the team of lawyers. The lawyers demand from Deborah self-denial of satisfaction voicing her
strong opinions. It has been some time ago when I understood that often our ego
makes us want to do or say things which really harm us. At work, I was often
confronted with the situation when people wanted to argue their point even if
this was detrimental to a desired outcome. I was saying then: “Do you want to
be right or do you want to solve the problem?”. Clever question and I need to
confess that I borrowed it from someone. I like the question, it hit me with
its obvious truth and power. It is so useful to remember it at times when we
want to fight rather than go in the direction of the desired outcome. Like in
this film.
There
were two awarded roles in the film. One of Rachel Weisz playing Rachel Lipstadt
(Academy Award) and the Cannes Award for Timothy Spall playing David Irving. My
favourite, however, was Tom Wilkinson who played Richard Rampton QC defending Rachel
Lipstadt. I noticed Tom Wilkinson the first time in his role in Michael Clayton and only then I started to pay attention to this very good and
likeable actor.
My
rating of the film is 8 out of 10.
